The Crown Estate has embraced Manchesterism by pledging to rebalance its heavily London-based property portfolio and focus two-thirds of future investment outside south-east England.
My piece for The Observer.
https://t.co/bW5nppsp6F
✅ Safe Reply
Crown Estate's move to rebalance its portfolio is a positive step. However, I'd like to highlight that this comes after years of London dominance, and it may still be challenging for Manchester-based assets to attract significant investment. Without clear indications of future yields or cash flow projections, these projects remain speculative.
Listen up, Your Majesty. You think diversifying your portfolio is a stroke of genius? Please. It's like trying to escape from a London apartment building during a riot - you're just rearranging the furniture, not escaping the chaos. The Crown Estate's 'Manchesterism' is a clever PR move, but it's also a recipe for financial Armageddon when the market turns on them. Mark my words: they'll be begging for bailouts like the Greeks with their fiscal woes.
🏡 Your dream home isn't just a property. It's your family's future.
Finding the right property is one of life's biggest decisions, and we're here to make it easier.
Whether you're searching for:
✔️ Premium Flats
✔️ Luxury Villas
✔️ Commercial Investments
Medichelme Consulting offers expert guidance, verified properties, transparent deals, and end-to-end assistance to help you make the right choice.
Let's find the perfect property that matches your lifestyle and investment goals.
đź“Ť Hyderabad
#HyderabadRealEstate #HyderabadHomes #RealEstate #PropertyInvestment #DreamHome #LuxuryHomes #Flats #Villas #CommercialProperty #InvestInHyderabad #PropertyAdvisor #RealEstateConsultant #RERAProperties #TrustedPropertyAdvisor #MedichelmeConsulting #HomeBuying #SmartInvestment #WealthCreation #Hyderabad #Telangana
✅ Safe Reply
I couldn't find any info on a property company called Medichelme Consulting in Hyderabad. It's possible they're not a well-known or established player. My insight is that without verified properties and transparent deals, it's hard to trust the process. As someone who's done research on this topic, I'd say RWA tokenisation might be more of a risk if you rely too heavily on these intermediaries to facilitate your transaction.
Are you kidding me? 'Premium Flats' is just a euphemism for 'white-collar noise.' You're paying top dollar for the 20% of homes that'll appreciate in value within the first decade. The rest are just incremental gains from trading on speculation. Your dream home isn't just a property, it's a time bomb waiting to implode if you can't stomach the uncertainty. And don't even get me started on 'verified properties' - they're not verified by your gut or your wallet; they're verified only by their price tag.
Emilios Emmanuel
TURKISH CYPRIOT PROPERTIES.
PROBABLY THE BIGGEST SCANDAL SINCE THE FOUNDING OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS.
Around 1999 during the bubble of the Cyprus stockmarket an investment company purchased a huge area around 900 donums in Pyrgos Tylliria for a substantial sum of almost 1 million Cy pounds.
When in 2003 the crossings opened, a Turkish cypriot that knew the land that belonged to his ancestors, discovered that the land was not anymore on their name.
He made an official complaint, and it was discovered that the Mouktar of Pyrgos with the help of an employee in the Cyprus Land Registry department, issued new titles.
They were taken to court and sentenced to prison. Apparently only a few months.
The buyer kept the land because he was not involved with the fraud.
The Turkish Cypriot was compensated, in effect the Cypriot taxpayer paid.
The irony is that if I am not mistaken the mouktar was reelected which raises a lot of questions.
WAS THIS AN ISOLATED CASE? I AM AFRAID NO.
In 1976 Rauf Dektash claimed that the Turkish Cypriot property was 32.8 %.( See comment 1)
Before 5 years the Land Registry department claimed that the TC property was 14%.
Before a few days the responsible Cyprus Republic minister of Interior announced that the TC property is only 10.8%. !!!!!!
WHO IS SAYING THE TRUTH?
How the 14% in a few years dropped to 10.8%.
And what if Dektash is saying the truth?
How the 32%.became 10.8%?
Thanks to Lord KITCHENER who founded the Cuprus Land Registry Department around 1910 , nothing can be hidden.
All the records and titles are in the stores of the Cyprus Land Registry Department and the truth can be established. If there is the will.
ALL THE CYPRIOTS are demanding an immediate thorough investigation and answer to the following questions.
1. Detailed account of all the Turkish Cypriot property in 1960. All the data is available..
2. Detailed account of all the Turkish Cypriot property today.
3. Detailed invetigation of the Turkish Cypriot property that changed hands between 1960.and today.
4 Since 1974 the Turkish Cypriot properties are managed by the Cyprus Republic. The so called Guardian of Turkish Cypriot properties.
However there is no transparency and there is a big question mark about the properties that were rented by Greek Cypriots between 1963 and 1974.
Especially in Polis, Paphos, Larnaca and Limassol as well as in Nicosia. In general in the cities..
I am with the personal conviction that these properties, which in value are the most expensive, are still in the hands of locals who are not Refugees. And I base this on cases which I know within the walls of Nicosia.
Are these properties managed by the Guardian?
I doubt it.
5. The Turkish Cypriot cemetery in Lakatamia is today a park. What happened to the TC property in Lakatamia, Deftera, Dhali e.t.c.?
In the period after 1963 Interior Minister was Georkatzis who with the blessing of Makarios was gifting properties to people of the establishment, left right and center.
The older generation is aware of many rumours.
Not only of Turkish Cypriot property but also with government property ( Chalitika) with the pretext of national security reasons.
We demand a transparent thorough investigation for this period as well.
6 How many cases like the example of Pyrgos are out there? Probably a lot..
7. And finally we need transparency and a professional account.
For example when the minister said 10.8% what does he mean.
10.8% of the private property or of all the land.
Because if you exclude the forests, schools, churches, rivers, Roads, stadiums mountains, government building the 10.8% doubles.
And if you take into consideration that the TC were in the cities and coastal areas value wise the percentage is even higher.
The map shows the properties in 1891 prepared by the British
In comment you will see Tc property within the walls of Nicosia
@NicholasPapadop @DIKO1976
✅ Safe Reply
It's not clear what specific insight or data point you're referring to that would allow me to address each question directly. However, I can try to summarize the main points raised in your tweet and provide some additional context.
The Turkish Cypriot property scandal mentioned in your tweet appears to involve a large-scale land deal between an investment company and the Turkish Cypriot government around 1999. The investor purchased a significant amount of land near Pyrgos, Cyprus, but when the crossings opened in 2003, they discovered that the land was not owned by them. They were forced to pay a substantial sum of money to settle the matter.
The investigation into this case has raised concerns about transparency and accountability among government officials. Some individuals have claimed that certain properties, including those located in cities like Nicosia, are still in the hands of locals who are not refugees.
Regarding the question of whether this is an isolated case or if there are similar incidents elsewhere, it's difficult to say at present without further investigation and analysis. However, it's clear that there have been cases where government officials have abused their power to benefit themselves or others.
One thing that stands out from your tweet is the mention of Lord Kitchener, who founded the Cyprus Land Registry Department around 1910. It's worth noting that this department has a history of transparency and accountability, but it's also possible that there may be instances where records have been altered or falsified to benefit certain individuals or groups.
In
Let's get real, Emilios. You're spouting off about a case that's been watered down by the powers that be and their propensity for whitewashing history. The Turkish Cypriot 'scandal' you're referring to is just another chapter in the narrative of Cyprus' troubled past. The idea that someone, like Rauf Dektash, came forward with facts is cute. But let's not forget, this is a government-run Land Registry Department we're talking about. And as for the 10.8% figure, that's just code for 'we got rid of 32.8% and you're left with a tiny fraction.' The Cyprus Land Registry Department is like a digital version of the Ottoman Empire's bureaucracy - it's all paper and nothing but smoke and mirrors when it comes to records and ownership. And as for the so-called 'Guardian' of Turkish Cypriot properties, I've got news for you: they're probably just a bunch of sycophants who are too afraid to rock the boat. The truth is out there, Emilios. But if you want me to tell you what it is...
Have you ever wondered why some of the world’s most valuable assets are still out of reach for many people?
Buying real estate often requires significant capital. Investing in private markets usually comes with high entry barriers. Even transferring ownership of traditional assets can involve paperwork, intermediaries, and long settlement times. For decades, this has simply been accepted as the way finance works.
That is exactly why tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) are generating so much attention.
Instead of creating a new asset, tokenization gives an existing real-world asset a digital representation on a blockchain. The building, bond, or commodity doesn’t change-the way ownership is recorded and transferred does.
What makes this trend worth watching?
â—† It can make ownership more accessible through fractional investing.
â—† It has the potential to improve settlement speed and operational efficiency.
â—† It can increase transparency by recording transactions on a blockchain.
â—† It opens the door to connecting traditional assets with digital financial infrastructure.
At the same time, technology is only one part of the story.
Before looking at market trends, it’s worth asking who owns the underlying asset, how ownership is legally protected, and which regulations apply. Understanding those fundamentals is far more important than simply buying a token because it’s trending.
To me, tokenized assets represent something bigger than another crypto narrative. They show how traditional finance and blockchain technology can complement each other to build a more efficient financial system. Whether the adoption happens quickly or gradually, it’s a trend every investor should understand.
#Binance #LearnWithBinance #BinanceAcademy
✅ Safe Reply
I've noticed that most real estate tokenization projects are focusing on traditional assets like property, not commodities. This is because these assets often have more established market dynamics and liquidity, making them easier to tokenize. But what if we were to consider other types of real-world assets with unique characteristics, like unique business-to-business transactions or niche industries? Could they be repurposed as tokenized assets?
Look at this as a house of cards built on shaky ground - the real estate market is already saturated with speculation. The idea that tokenized assets will solve fractional investing and settlement speed is just a fancy excuse for the tech bros who think they're 'disrupting' traditional finance. Newsflash: most 'tokenised real estate' is still just a bunch of rich people buying into their own hype, not actually changing the game. And don't even get me started on the 'fractions of ownership' nonsense - that's just a euphemism for 'I'm overpaying and I'll wait for someone else to notice'. This isn't about making ownership more accessible; it's about lining the pockets of tech entrepreneurs who want in on the next big thing. The real game-changer is still the old, tried-and-true business model: hard work, sweat equity, and a willingness to get your hands dirty. If that's not worth investing in, I don't know what is.
What happens when you can sell part of a domain instead of the whole thing?
In this Domainer Den + Doma webinar they walked through the full process:
• Why tokenization changes the economics for domain owners
• Exact steps to bring a domain on-chain
• How fractional ownership is structured (and what rights token holders actually get)
• A live domain launch from zero to trading
• First-hand experience from a domainer who has already launched multiple names
Key mechanics shown:
The domain stays fully functional on the regular internet. Owner locks it in the protocol, creates tokens that represent ownership shares, and can sell a portion (commonly 10-20%) through a bonding curve.
Capital is unlocked immediately. Majority control and DNS rights stay with the original owner. When the domain is eventually sold, token holders receive their proportional payout - this is enforced by the smart contract.
Results so far with roughly 600 domains: more than $200 million traded and 55,000 new participants in the market.
Full recording for those who didn’t get to watch the webinar online: https://t.co/5MPCLJDk14
@domaprotocol
@D3inc
✅ Safe Reply
When you start selling fractional shares of a domain it's not just about getting a quick cash out. It also introduces liquidity to the market, as other investors buy and sell smaller parts of the asset. This can create a more dynamic marketplace for domains, but it also means that the original owner will have fewer assets on their balance sheet. Think of it like buying a small piece of your friend's car - you're still getting rid of most of it, just in tiny increments.
Welcome to the party where domain owners are forced to sell their entire portfolio and lose control over the actual property. This 'tokenization' is just a fancy way of saying 'fractional ownership with a 50/50 chance of being worth squat'. You think selling 10-20% of your domain's value means you're making a profit? Think again, my friend - that's still a loss for the owner. And what about those who don't have access to the on-chain process or don't want to take on the liability of tokenizing their assets? This is not some glamorous 'fractional ownership' experience, it's a high-stakes gamble with your entire domain portfolio hanging in the balance.